JD's bazaar

User avatar
wulf
Posts: 6797
Location: Tornado Alley
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by wulf »

doe.1971 wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2024 5:36 pm trio 0948390 image.jpg
I love the Public Service Announcement hanging just above the entrance. :twisted:
https://ralphus.net/thegimpforum/downlo ... &mode=view

Nice work and thanks for sharing.
Slave Rule #1- No matter how bad the pain is, it can always get worse
User avatar
doe.1971
Posts: 1856
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by doe.1971 »

Thanks W. Double.
User avatar
LLL
Posts: 750
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by LLL »

How I would like to recall total recall.

JD won't believe it, but the input was actually "small breasts". Fooocus clearly believes size matters.
Attachments
2024-10-29_07-59-00_5741.png
User avatar
doe.1971
Posts: 1856
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by doe.1971 »

LLL wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 3:01 am How I would like to recall total recall.

JD won't believe it, but the input was actually "small breasts". Fooocus clearly believes size matters.
Nice. As for AI, not all datasets contains references to the size of breasts (they were not identified by size) in general use sets, like Juggernaut or RealisticStockPhoto. So mentioning the size doesn't affect the results.

Other datasets, like SDXXXL, that are made with female nudity in mind, will react very strongly to small/medium/large breasts prompts.

And here's Cassandra of Assassins' Creed in a wealthy noble dungeon, after being caught trying to steal valuables from his house.
Untitled-4.jpg
User avatar
doe.1971
Posts: 1856
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by doe.1971 »

When using small breasts as prompts in SDXXXL, the same image becomes like this. Anyone who ever watched a single movie with Sharon Stone would say that's more realistic.

image.jpg
bleumune
Posts: 401
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by bleumune »

doe.1971 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 3:50 pm Anyone who ever watched a single movie with Sharon Stone would say that's more realistic.
Whatever. I'll go with the Fooocus interpretation. :lol:
User avatar
LLL
Posts: 750
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by LLL »

bleumune wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:34 pm
doe.1971 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 3:50 pm Anyone who ever watched a single movie with Sharon Stone would say that's more realistic.
Whatever. I'll go with the Fooocus interpretation. :lol:
Fooocus 1 realism 0 :lol: Thanks Bluemune!
User avatar
doe.1971
Posts: 1856
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by doe.1971 »

LLL wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 5:07 pm Fooocus 1 realism 0 :lol: Thanks Bluemune!
It's not a game of preferences, it was mainly a technical explanation of the AI behavior. What hardens the shaft of each of us is a different purview.
User avatar
cluseb
Posts: 1082
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by cluseb »

doe.1971 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 3:50 pm When using small breasts as prompts in SDXXXL, the same image becomes like this. Anyone who ever watched a single movie with Sharon Stone would say that's more realistic.


image.jpg
I'll take Sharon Stone the way God made her
Image
User avatar
LLL
Posts: 750
Contact:

Re: JD's bazaar

Post by LLL »

doe.1971 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:57 pm
LLL wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 5:07 pm Fooocus 1 realism 0 :lol: Thanks Bluemune!
It's not a game of preferences, it was mainly a technical explanation of the AI behavior. What hardens the shaft of each of us is a different purview.
Come on JD, where is your great sense of humour? Of course your technical explanation was correct.
Post Reply

Return to “Art Contributions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cluseb and 21 guests