AI enhanced detective mag covers

[wulf]

A wet halter without a bra under it (yum) and shorts are nice, but nude is better...

These are all damned good. It's nice to see them they way they should have been.

Thanks for sharing.

[thx1139a]

A wet halter without a bra under it (yum) and shorts are nice, but nude is better...

These are all damned good. It's nice to see them they way they should have been.

Thanks for sharing.

Glad you are enjoying them! About 90% of the output isn't worth keeping, let alone good. It's hit or miss, and I hit reload a lot... sometimes you get something better, sometimes worse, and about half the time (if it's a good cover) the NSFW filter blocks the output. Some covers it rejects completely, even if you type something innocent like "bikini" and it blocks the output every single time! But, it's free so I am absolutely not complaining. More to come.

[hornythumb]

I fully agree with wulf. The outputs are really, really good all things considered. At last there is a socially beneficial application for AI.

[thx1139a]

I fully agree with wulf. The outputs are really, really good all things considered. At last there is a socially beneficial application for AI.

Thanks for the kind words. It should be interesting to see what the software can do in 3-5 years... I think this is just the beginning. Someone should run it without the NSFW filters though...

This image, for example, was too hot for it to consider at ALL... for the heck of it after trying to get it to remove the bikini with no luck I told it to put a shirt and pants on the girl instead of the bikini she was wearing. It rejected that as well! The black screen on the right indicates the NSFW filter kicked in...

(Image URL used here to save space on the site)... https://www.mediafire.com/file/hiokhr0k ... 2.jpg/file

[thx1139a]

Her expression is indicative of something more interesting than having her top pulled up... and the AI agreed and removed it...

[yyy02]

Her expression is indicative of something more interesting than having her top pulled up... and the AI agreed and removed it...

This software is amazing, as it's obviously taking something from a resource library to do its replacements. How does it know, to distinguish one flesh area from another? Do you select the area(s) that you want replaced?

[thx1139a]

Her expression is indicative of something more interesting than having her top pulled up... and the AI agreed and removed it...

This software is amazing, as it's obviously taking something from a resource library to do its replacements. How does it know, to distinguish one flesh area from another? Do you select the area(s) that you want replaced?

You just upload the photo, then use a simple drawing tool ala paint to mask out the area you want replaced (you can adjust the width of the "pen" just like in paint... larger width for larger areas, small diameter for small areas). Then type a keyword or two (eg "topless" or "nude" into the text box and click "run." You may or may not get what you want. If the result is a black frame, the NSFW has blocked the result (jerks). Hit run again. And again. And again. Try a different keyword. Back off and try something more innocuous like "bikini." Repeat.

[thx1139a]

Here’s an example of a cover image that worked to show that and what happens when it doesn’t when you press the system too far and the NSFW filter kicks in (in a lot of cases it would kick in asking to show her topless, but the filter doesn’t kick in here with this one for whatever reason). So save space on the board here, I'm liking the images (I'd rather save the space for the actual images


Step 1: Drag and drop the image in.

https://www.mediafire.com/view/sejtsnxi ... 1.jpg/file

Step 2: use the brush tool to mask out the part of the image you want replaced. You can adjust the width of the brush to cover large areas or smaller ones (e.g. shoulder straps). Type a keyword or two into the prompt box. Simple and few are better I think. Click “run”… it usually takes 10-30 seconds to produce a result.

https://www.mediafire.com/view/ad11xgsn ... 1.jpg/file


Step 3: Example of successful result.

https://www.mediafire.com/view/aqrhps4v ... 6.jpg/file

Step 4: Example of unsuccessful result—black box… the NSFW filter has kicked in. You may be able to get it to work… hit “run” a few more times. If that doesn't work back off a bit and go to something more innocuous like “bikini” of “negligee.” Sometimes I’ve been able to fool it by typing “transparent negligee.”

https://www.mediafire.com/view/mtb0wtu9 ... 0.jpg/file

Your milage may vary. Interested in hearing from those who can get minimal NSFW results so I can emulate their tactics

Try it out at https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimoda ... inpainting

[thx1139a]

What's better than a full-breasted girl being choked with a chain? A topless full breasted girl being choked with a chain...

[frog]

Seeing these makes me think of what would have happened to my perverse imagination if detective mag covers were so explicit. They were "damaging" enough without the nudity. I remember creeping embarrassed to the magazine rack of the local pharmacy to catch a glimpse of those covers plus the assorted Men's Adventure mags that sometimes were found next to the detective mags. There was no internet then and getting a hold of something "stronger" was next to impossible, especially for an adolescent.

On the other hand, it makes me wonder how those covers might have looked if Blakemore, of HOM fame, would have been the photographer. Who inspired who? I often detect an air of detective mag covers in the way Blakemore posed his "victims" and the sites he used for his photo shoots. Or maybe it was the other way around, cover photographers for detective mags secretly imitating Blakemore. There is a third alternative, maybe the source for Blakemore and detectivve mag photographers were the pulp covers of earlier times.