AI-generated whipping video

User avatar
yyy02
Posts: 3990
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by yyy02 »

dmon wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 4:45 pm I’m of the rather pessimistic view that data centers will darken the sky with irreversible pollution before we ever get to the point where AI can create anything of that length in a way that replaces real people. You’ll always be able to tell it’s AI and, from my point of view, it’ll never be as good as the real thing.

I could be wrong and I’ll eat my words one day if I am.
You are correct, I think, in that you are always be able to tell. At least for now.
But IMO, you just have to supply the last bit... your imagination. Or call it suspension of disbelief, or whatever.
In this example: https://www.fpo.xxx/video/989740/ai-big-tit-brunette they got the fluid motion of big breasts, plus the effects of gravity on breast shape, generally right. Being a boob man, trust me, I pay attention to that. :D

Computing power/data storage is always advancing. The left hand, combined with the right hand of software creation, if you will.
So someday, you won't be able to tell. And that power/capability will eventually trickle down to XXX. It always does.
IMO, of course.
bakerboy
Posts: 663
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by bakerboy »

AS per all your comments: This video intrigued me in the past Summer.

https://youtu.be/t-nQMFCtY6s

[media] [/media]

I also appreciate and believe the comments from Floor 13: that really AI does NOT yet exist to be able to make " scripted" 15 sec shot. In retrospect the video also has only 5 sec shots without nudity. In my naiveté when I saw video in the Summer, I assumed that all what somebody needs to do is to " undress" some of the ladies, have them do some " naughty" bits, extend the shots and voila..... I can buy about 100 of shots and make a movie. I was wrong. This is NOT yet happening.

Anyone can prove me wrong. :D
bakerboy
Posts: 663
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by bakerboy »

Floor13 wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 11:33 am
bakerboy wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 10:03 am Wow, thank you for your information I had NO clue..... at least I knew that at least for now that all these AI BS are just a " novelty items". That is why I have given up finding a serious AI shots supplier.
It will come eventually.
Like you, I've been investigating. Playing with it a lot for the last 12 months (Images, then videos.)

Calling it AI and saying it is "Computer generated" really is misleading. It is 'just' copying an existing image or video and repainting it. (I say 'just' because obviously, still impressive).

The big models are all trained in China, and are censored (No NSFW stuff. Just imaging pixelated Chinese porn, but now just black bars). Indeed, some tools will detect NSFW and paint it all black.

So the stuff with nudity is basically a reworked version of those chinese models (Not exactly hacked... )

So with the big Google VEO3 and others, they will NEVER be anything by family friendly.


With whipping, it requires fast motion. The AI generated stuff is notoriously bad with fast motion for 2 reasons.
1) Trained on slow motion stuff and stock footage.
2) Generating video at home is VERY intensive and time consuming (40 minutes for 5 seconds on powerfull hardware, if you want it to look reasonable). SO the workaround is "lightening" loras, which REALLY speed up the process, BUT the downside is not as good quality, and the no fast motion (Like swinging a whip, or an electrical jerk of the body).



You can make a new 5 second video based on the final frame of the first 5 second video of course... BUT, you are making a copy of a copy, then another copy, then another. So after 25 seconds, your carefully created blond white woman in a detailed room, is now a black haired chinese woman in a blurry basic room. (Seriously you can watch her morph over 25 seconds as it returns to the Chinese models it was based on).


It will happen eventually. Just not yet.

Also, to add insult to injury, the 5 second film, basically the 'stuff' you requested will only happen in the last 3 seconds. SO really it is a 3 second film with a 2 second build up. Difficult to cut the 'start' and make it begin in 'action' if you know what I mean.
See my post just above and thanks again.
User avatar
Floor13
Posts: 297
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by Floor13 »

dmon wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 4:45 pm I’m of the rather pessimistic view that data centers will darken the sky with irreversible pollution before we ever get to the point where AI can create anything of that length in a way that replaces real people. You’ll always be able to tell it’s AI and, from my point of view, it’ll never be as good as the real thing.

I could be wrong and I’ll eat my words one day if I am.
You are probably correct correct considering how much power they use to create the models. And how few nuclear power stations are being built.

Out of interest, what do you consider "real"? Just the fact that it is a human being filmed?
Trust me, You'll like it... Eventually.
dmon
Posts: 62
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by dmon »

Floor13 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:33 am
dmon wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 4:45 pm I’m of the rather pessimistic view that data centers will darken the sky with irreversible pollution before we ever get to the point where AI can create anything of that length in a way that replaces real people. You’ll always be able to tell it’s AI and, from my point of view, it’ll never be as good as the real thing.

I could be wrong and I’ll eat my words one day if I am.
You are probably correct correct considering how much power they use to create the models. And how few nuclear power stations are being built.

Out of interest, what do you consider "real"? Just the fact that it is a human being filmed?
Yep that’s all I meant. I know then you have to deal with the less than stellar acting and business practices that come with the territory, but I think based on what I know that my tastes aren’t quite as strict as yours. No disrespect, of course. That’s just based on some of your posts.

Nothing wrong with that, but I can understand why you would be a little more frustrated with things than I am, generally.
User avatar
Floor13
Posts: 297
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by Floor13 »

dmon wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:45 am
Out of interest, what do you consider "real"? Just the fact that it is a human being filmed?
Yep that’s all I meant. I know then you have to deal with the less than stellar acting and business practices that come with the territory, but I think based on what I know that my tastes aren’t quite as strict as yours. No disrespect, of course. That’s just based on some of your posts.

Nothing wrong with that, but I can understand why you would be a little more frustrated with things than I am, generally.
[/quote]

Eesh, is that how I come across?
I'm usually typing on my phone so it misses some finesse.
I always assumed everyone was the same, in that they could watch 100 near identical scenes and it would just be that 1 tiny thing that ruins it. There was a really hot 'forced' bj scene I used to have, and as her trembling face was about to socket itself around a cock, she did the pornstar hair-behind-ear-tuck so we could see clearly. Damn, instant mood killer. :)

There are some good Lara Croft animations rule34 that really work for me, but that is probably because it is a hot Lara. If it were just another animated women, I'm sure it would be dry.
Trust me, You'll like it... Eventually.
dmon
Posts: 62
Contact:

Re: AI-generated whipping video

Post by dmon »

Floor13 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:50 am
dmon wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:45 am
Out of interest, what do you consider "real"? Just the fact that it is a human being filmed?
Yep that’s all I meant. I know then you have to deal with the less than stellar acting and business practices that come with the territory, but I think based on what I know that my tastes aren’t quite as strict as yours. No disrespect, of course. That’s just based on some of your posts.

Nothing wrong with that, but I can understand why you would be a little more frustrated with things than I am, generally.
Eesh, is that how I come across?
I'm usually typing on my phone so it misses some finesse.
I always assumed everyone was the same, in that they could watch 100 near identical scenes and it would just be that 1 tiny thing that ruins it. There was a really hot 'forced' bj scene I used to have, and as her trembling face was about to socket itself around a cock, she did the pornstar hair-behind-ear-tuck so we could see clearly. Damn, instant mood killer. :)

There are some good Lara Croft animations rule34 that really work for me, but that is probably because it is a hot Lara. If it were just another animated women, I'm sure it would be dry.
[/quote]
I mean no disrespect of course. You like what you like. No issue with that.

And yeah I’ve been there as well. For me it’s the inclusion of a cock in the video at all. I’m not bi and I’ve never really understood porn in that respect. I don’t like cocks and don’t want to look at them, so I’d imagine one popping up in the middle of an otherwise enticing video would put me off.
Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Edukator and 55 guests